Chow" pulls consciousness "Dom Som", don't be in a hurry. After having a clip of the meeting report On the other hand, documented reports pointing out questions and answers at the meeting have no weight in the case of "Pita" holding media shares. Clear evidence indicates that media shares are held or not. Look at the financial statements. Are the objectives and revenue from the media business?
Mr. Chao Meekhuad, former deputy spokesman of the Democrat Party, posted on Facebook Chao Meekhuad on Don't be in a hurry. The clip of ITV's shareholders' meeting report contains content stating that In case of talking about the minutes of the 2023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of ITV Public Company Limited, there is a conflict between the clip of the meeting held on April 26, 2023 and the minutes of the Company's annual general meeting of shareholders on the issue that ITV still operates. Media business? To the extent that it came out to confirm that this is an important piece of evidence to prove that ITV is no longer a media business. Will eventually cause Mr. Phitha to drop out of the media shareholding case As for him, he was of the opinion that the evidence, whether it was the minutes of the shareholders' meeting Or the clip of the shareholders' meeting is not evidence. important that ITV Are you still in the media business? Because considering whether any business is a newspaper or any mass media business under section 98 (3) of the constitutional law, it must be based on the facts according to the objectives of the business. not listening from questions and answers at the shareholders' meeting In which he considered that the minutes of the shareholders' meeting that were published here are even more important evidence that ITV still exists in the media business.
“If considering the previous decision of the Constitutional Court It will be found that the important evidence that the Court gives weight to is financial statements, income derived from media operations or not. is an indicator that Is the company's stock held a media stock? Even though there was an objective to produce media, but the income that was not generated from the media was saved, as seen in the decision of the Constitutional Court. In the case of 64 former MPs from both the government and opposition parties Only one person was expelled from the S.O.P. is Thanwarin Sukhapisit, former member of the Future Forward Party The case of Mr. Phitha Will it survive or not survive the media stock lawsuit? So it's not at the question. Answers to the minutes of the shareholders' meeting But the evidence clearly shows that Do you hold shares in a company that earns income from media business? And most importantly, regardless of which party Do not distort the law By bringing the point that is not very important to erase the facts because that is not the right way,” Mr. Chao specified. Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency