Election Commission clarified that if the MPs who were complained were not investigated within the 60-day period, they could later find corruption. As for submitting to the Constitutional Court, interpreting the status of “Pita” must be careful. Documents and evidence must be firm. Fairness to all parties
Reporters reported that Mr. Thitichet Nuchanat, Commissioner of the Election Commission (ECT) came to observe and observe the work of officials who facilitated MPs who have been certified to receive certificates to report. next Ready to give an interview about the announcement of the endorsement of all 500 MPs, saying that the Election Commission had a resolution to certify the election results of 400 constituency MPs and 100 party-list MPs, totaling 500. Since the investigation process in the petition objecting to the election has not yet been completed within the 60-day period, the result must be announced first.
“The investigation of various complaints continues in accordance with the legal process, within 30 days of the announcement of the Election Commission of Thailand. If anyone sees someone certified as MPs acting dishonestly You can complain to the Election Commission of Thailand for investigation. If investigating and found guilty of corruption Will collect evidence to present to the court for further consideration, ”said Mr. Thitichet.
In the case of Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Pracharat Palang Pracharat Party send a letter to The Election Commission of Thailand uses the channel under Section 82 of the Constitution to submit to the Constitutional Court to determine the status of Member of Parliament of Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat Member of the House of Representatives and candidate for the Prime Minister, Kao Klai Party, Mr. Thitichet said that it is currently in the consideration process. Ask for the power of the investigative committee at the Election Commission. set up as an operator first The audit process must have documentary witnesses. The evidence is complete and sufficient to present to the court. If it is not complete, the court may not accept it for consideration. Therefore, the Election Commission must proceed with detail and prudence. Including being fair to all parties. especially the defendant
When asked whether the existing documents are sufficient or not. Will I have to call or ask for more later? Mr. Thitichet said that everything had to be called. Whether the meeting evidence List of assets and evidence of Mr. Phitha's shareholding to consider whether the evidence matches or not Although now there is some information. but for clarity and fairness to Mr. Phitha It is necessary to examine it carefully.
“Currently gathering evidence before proposing to the ECT, I believe that the investigative committee that the ECT has set up from experts will do it with swiftness. And after this, Mr. Phitha and other people involved should be invited to clarify, ”said Mr. Thitichet
Source: Thai News Agency