Parliament, "Rangsiman Rome" asks not to focus on the dissolution of Move Forward, confident in the law, fellow MPs will stay with the party, points out that the PM's case should not use the court mechanism to decide, must use the political process, criticizes "Thaksin" in the end did not come back to raise grandchildren but came to play a role in politics. Mr. Rangsiman Rome, MP of the Move Forward Party, talked about the dissolution of the Move Forward Party, which the Constitutional Court will rule on on August 7th, saying that it is a very important day for the Move Forward Party and we believe that if we talk about the law, evidence, and various processes that have occurred, it is unlikely to lead to the dissolution of the party. We hope that it will happen like this. However, because it is an important case and a legal case that society is watching closely because the Move Forward Party this year is the largest party in the parliament, trusted by more than 14 million people. Therefore, it is not somet hing that Thai society wants to see a political party being dissolved easily. Thai society has seen enough party dissolutions and has only encountered new conflicts. The dissolution of political parties should have ended from this year. Therefore, we expect that August 7th will be the day that Thai society will no longer have any more party dissolutions. As for preparing a backup party in case the court actually dissolves the Move Forward Party and whether they have checked the names of the Move Forward Party's MPs, Mr. Rangsiman said that regarding preparation, he believes that we can look at the various political parties that have been dissolved, including the Future Forward Party, which was dissolved. It is not something that all parties can predict how we will handle it. However, the important thing that the Move Forward Party wants to tell society is that party dissolution should not happen again because political parties have the right and voice because the people support them. Therefore, if political parties are destroyed and cannot have a place in society or in the political circle, it should come from the people who decide. Let the dissolution of the party happen by the people. 'For me, the dissolution of parties by the court process should be over in this year. We should let the people decide for themselves what kind of policies and what kind of political party they want,' said Mr. Rangsiman. Regarding the case of Ms. Sirikanya Tansakul, deputy leader of the Move Forward Party, expressing her readiness to be the new party leader, Mr. Rangsiman said that it was just talking about general readiness. However, initially, on August 7, he wanted society to focus on the fact that there should be no more party dissolutions. 'Today, the dissolution of the party has not yet arrived, but everyone is saying that the party will definitely be dissolved. No matter what, Move Forward will definitely be dissolved. I think that is what those in power want to be like. In the end, working in politics is based on fear o f not being able to fully implement policies. In the end, many policies need to be considered based on legal limitations. It is not that we can implement policies. We must do everything correctly according to the procedures and processes. When the court ruled to stop the action, there was no action that could indicate that we had additional actions that led to the dissolution of the party. We did not violate any laws. When we looked at the EC process, there were real problems. But today, society is focused on Move Forward being dissolved. We may have been so focused on Move Forward being dissolved that we forgot that there were some methods of power that may not have been legally used. This caused these people to not be held responsible at all. I would like society to help focus and help look at whether the EC process was correct or not. We listened to what Mr. Chaiwat announced to the media and have been updated from time to time. The important question is whether the process that occurred was legal and fair to us as a political party and fair to the 14 million people who voted,' said Mr. Rangsiman. Mr. Rangsiman reiterated that he is still confident in the law and fellow Move Forward MPs who will stay with the party for everyone. As for August, with many cases, how will there be political ripples? Mr. Rangsiman said that in the case of Prime Minister Settha Thavisin, he, as an opposition party, does not support him to become Prime Minister. But when he is, the end of his term as Prime Minister should not be done through the mechanism of the court. In the case of appointing Mr. Phichit Chuenban as a minister, he personally thinks it is inappropriate, given the accusations that have arisen. But to the extent that the Prime Minister must be removed from being Prime Minister in this matter, it may be too much. He still thinks that in the end, the political process should be used. When appointing someone who is not suitable and does not have good enough qualifications to be a minister, the people should have the rig ht to criticize and political measures should follow, which is the best method. Regarding the political changes in August and the involvement of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, Mr. Rangsiman Rome said that politics changes in every period. We see that in the end, Mr. Thaksin did not return to raise his grandchildren, but has become increasingly involved in politics. We do not know where it will end up. We see that there is only one sun. If there are two suns, we do not know how they will coexist. It is difficult for the Settha government to manage because this difficulty means that all the civil servants under this government should think about who to listen to. Whether to look to the Chan Song La house or to Mr. Settha's orders, we do not know who has real power in this government at the moment. Source: Thai News Agency
Menu